| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Martek
Joined: 26 Nov 2006 Posts: 8
|
Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 12:03 am Post subject: Change shown Firmware Version of Emulated 2.71? |
|
|
Hello
I have bought Socom2 and can play it with my 2.71SE-C but I cant play online because it says that I have to update to 2.81..
I dont want to loose any Homebrew support, but I think if I would change the Version shown in the XMB in devhooked 2.71 Firmware(like XFlash does with 1.50) The update would work.
Does anyone know where I can find the 2.71 value? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rikki-Tikki-Tavi
Joined: 27 Nov 2006 Posts: 8
|
Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 1:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
Strange...
The changelog for SE-B'' contains
- Added SFO version bypass to real umd's. (this should enable gta vcs umd to be played.)
Apparently this doesn't work for in-game Firmware queries.
Last edited by Rikki-Tikki-Tavi on Mon Nov 27, 2006 1:16 am; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Martek
Joined: 26 Nov 2006 Posts: 8
|
Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 1:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Yes I already know this, but I think when I change the in Devhooked XMB showsn Firmware from 2.71 to 2.81 the game should work |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rikki-Tikki-Tavi
Joined: 27 Nov 2006 Posts: 8
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Martek
Joined: 26 Nov 2006 Posts: 8
|
Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 1:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
First: This is not actualy working with 2.71SE-C
Second: It cant change the XMB Shown Firmware of SE-Versions |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rikki-Tikki-Tavi
Joined: 27 Nov 2006 Posts: 8
|
Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 2:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well then downgrade to 2.71 SE B'
It's not as bad as loosing homebrew...
What makes you think it can't change the system software version number? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Martek
Joined: 26 Nov 2006 Posts: 8
|
Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 2:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I had already tried that whith this XFlash Version and the program said me: This feature is not für 2.71SE or something else |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rikki-Tikki-Tavi
Joined: 27 Nov 2006 Posts: 8
|
Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 2:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Did you use v16f? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Martek
Joined: 26 Nov 2006 Posts: 8
|
Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 2:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Yes Im sure... Have you tried this yourself? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rikki-Tikki-Tavi
Joined: 27 Nov 2006 Posts: 8
|
Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 2:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
No, I don't have Socom, and I don't feel like downgrading and upgrading right now...
Sorry for wasting your time then. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
zshadow
Joined: 26 Dec 2005 Posts: 42
|
Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 4:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
in the new SE-C SDK you can set the version number by doing
| Code: | | sctrlKernelSetDevkitVersion(0x02080110); |
That would change the version number to 2.81 for example. However, the problem with SOCOM 2 is not firmware version, it checks something else. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|