TyRaNiD
Joined: 18 Jan 2004
Posts: 918
|
 Posted: Fri Nov 03, 2006 6:43 am Post subject: Variable imports/exports |
 |
|
Well I have finally got around to working out how to use variable imports in modules, it isn't exactly trivial to setup so I am just putting out the information until I can be arsed to get around to working out how to implement the damn things ;)
I assume the reader knows how the library imports work, I am not going to go over it again :)
If a library has variable imports it sets up an extra pointer after the function and nid pointers are taken care of. This points to a table which has the structures of:
| Code: | struct VariableImport {
u32 *pFixups;
u32 nid;
}; |
The table contains a structure like this for each import. The nid value is obviously the value of the NID for the import entry, pFixup points to a mini relocation table which allows the kernel to patch your code to use the variable correctly.
Each fixup table is a list of 32bit integers terminated with a value of 0. Each entry represents one code fixup, the lower 26bits are the address of the fixup dividing by 4, the upper 6 bits correspond to the standard MIPS ELF relocation numbers which indicate what part to fixup, e.g.
| Code: | // MIPS Reloc Entry Types
#define R_MIPS_NONE 0
#define R_MIPS_16 1
#define R_MIPS_32 2
#define R_MIPS_REL32 3
#define R_MIPS_26 4
#define R_MIPS_HI16 5
#define R_MIPS_LO16 6
etc...
|
The value which is inserted at run time is the pointer to the variable as defined by the export process. Therefore it would need to be dereferenced.
Now to do this properly I think would require modifying the toolchain itself, something I am not in the mood to do, therefore my proposed solution is thus.
For every variable you use allocate a single 32bit integer and add the entry to fixup it's value as a whole. This can then be referenced by your code through a direct pointer rather than having to fix it up in the code itself.
So if you export say 'int myvariable;' then in your linked app you would get 'int * const pmyvariable;' Not as clean as I would like but hey them are the breaks. I might see if I can do this sooner or later, it would require some modification to the SDK.
If anyone thinks of a way to implement this properly without toolchain modifications I am all ears ;) |
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
