forums.ps2dev.org

MikeDX · Joined: 19 Oct 2005 Posts: 30

Is it worth me submitting a patch that fixes all the makefiles to create eboots rather than the plain .elf that some makefiles output.

Also I could submit something that automatically adds /c/devkitpro/devkitpsp/bin to the path when msys is launched - this will enable true out of the box setup and launch.

seventoes · Joined: 02 Oct 2005 Posts: 79

add "EXTRA_TARGETS = EBOOT.PBP" to your makefile and it will make an eboot...

MikeDX · Joined: 19 Oct 2005 Posts: 30

I'm aware of how to do it. I just wondered if it was worth modifying the handful of makefiles that DO NOT have that line so that the examples could be built easier.

Lack of response, hardly worth it.

weltall · Joined: 20 Feb 2004 Posts: 310

maybe it's a choice...

seventoes · Joined: 02 Oct 2005 Posts: 79

Yeah, some people dont want to make an EBOOT quite yet. Maybe they just want to make the elf for debugging.

Oh and not all people use DevKitPro, so their paths arent going to be the same. I use PSPSDK installed with the Oopo toolchain.

MikeDX · Joined: 19 Oct 2005 Posts: 30

I think the point has been totally missed. I was merely offering to make all of the example makefiles uniform across the examples, instead of needing to edit them manually. there are no hard coded paths in the makefiles.

Dr. Vegetable · Posted: Thu Dec 22, 2005 1:01 pm Post subject:

Personally I think this is a good idea, and a generous offer of your time and energy.

seventoes · Joined: 02 Oct 2005 Posts: 79

Oh... Well you said nothing about the samples... That would be a good thing though, because i got confused at first from the samples not making an eboot.

MikeDX · Joined: 19 Oct 2005 Posts: 30

my apologies..

it's one of those things where i've only actually written half of what my brain was thinking, somehow thinking it made sense.. although in my defense the topic title was "devkitpsp samples"