| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
djhuevo
Joined: 10 Mar 2005
Posts: 47
|
 Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2005 2:41 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
| mrbrown wrote: | For any error that's 8001xxxx the "xxxx" corresponds to an error code found in <errno.h>.
So 80010002 is ENOENT (No such file or directory), and 8001000D is EACCESS (Permission denied). |
and any clue about other error codes yet?
Im intersted in:
80020148
80020321
80020146
80020001
80000004
80000108
_________________
sobreviviendo en la tierra de los trolldev |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
konfig
Joined: 06 Jan 2005
Posts: 68
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2005 10:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| F9zDark wrote: | | konfig wrote: | | Arjan wrote: | the logic behind it is that there's a bug in the path parsing somewhere.
I could've found this if I tried to experiment more with the paths too :P (I bet it'll work with other characters too) |
if it is a bug in path parsing, I can't imagine how sony made such an obvious and stupid error(Just can't imagine, maybe it really is a bug. If anyone know how such an error is likely to occur while writing code, please tell people here).
At my first thought, it looks like some kind of system back door(don't know what it is for and done nothing to test yet). |
Come on, Sony was the company that released the 1.0 PSPs that had absolutely no necessity for encryption/signature reading, thus allowing homebrew code without hinderance...
This would also explain the 1.52 update, unless this problem is addressed in the 1.51 update, I hope it isn't . |
The hacker team said that the % error is a classic fat error. That's why it replaces the annoying ms swap.
I saw the above somewhere. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LordAlu
Joined: 08 Jun 2005
Posts: 1
Location: Brighouse, Huddersfield
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2005 3:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
| djhuevo wrote: |
and any clue about other error codes yet?
Im intersted in:
80020148
80020321
80020146
80020001
80000004
80000108 |
If i'm reading this right...
80020001 is simply "error"
80020146 is "prohibit LoadModule device"
80020148 is "unsupported PRX type"
80020321 is "no such device"
For the other two, 80000004 seems to be "not supported" and 80000108 I believe is "invalid format". |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
_Psycho
Joined: 14 Apr 2005
Posts: 28
Location: Montréal, Canada
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2005 1:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If someone wanna put all corrupted dir at the bottom of the list
rather than renaming them
cut and paste the % dirs in another directory
and cut and paste them back, thats will change the time on it.
They will all appear at the bottom way better |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
RATiX
Joined: 30 Apr 2005
Posts: 48
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 26, 2005 5:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Dunno if it's been mentioned, but SeiPSPTool03.exe works like the KXploit, and allows you to get rid of "Corrupted Data" messages... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Èl Nächó
Joined: 03 Apr 2005
Posts: 27
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 26, 2005 6:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
link plz.
Edit: nevermind. found it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Èl Nächó
Joined: 03 Apr 2005
Posts: 27
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 26, 2005 8:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Yeah, after spending some time with SeiPSPTool, I have to say it's better than KXploit in just about every way. The ability to "hide" the "Corrupted" folder from the menu, The ability to select your own icons and text for the programs, and you don't have to install it (it's just a 47K exe file). Good stuff, for anyone that's still using the KXploit (which I'd guess isn't too many folks around these parts, but still) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
